Oration and recitation, once staples of the American school system, have largely been phased out. Rhetoric programs at universities have narrowed, merged with communications departments, or been eliminated altogether...“We don’t have that kind of oral culture anymore,” said Prof. James Engell, author of “The Committed Word: Literature and Public Values,” who teaches a rhetoric course at Harvard. “We are in a culture that devalues our sense of memory.” Back when John Quincy Adams was teaching it, Mr. Engell said, “rhetoric was an umbrella where you got moral philosophy, the development of literary taste, intellectual prose, aesthetic appreciation, memorization and oral presentation. The ultimate object of this was what the Greeks called phronesis, or practical wisdom.”
...But contemporary scientists have discovered that memorization exercises can stave off dementia, introducing a new world of “neurobics.” Memory needs a workout as much as the abs do. Researchers have even shown that reciting poetry in dactylic hexameter can help synchronize heartbeats with breathing.
This blog reports new ideas and work on mind, brain, behavior, psychology, and politics - as well as random curious stuff. (Try the Dynamic Views at top of right column.)
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
The decline of memory
J.L. Bader notes that Britney Spear's memory lapse while she was lip-synching during the recent MTV music video awards is a reflection of the general decline of dependence on memory in our culture. Why remember anything, when you can always google or wikipedia it; and all your contacts and phone numbers are stored in your cell phone? (And yes, I was one of the $200 beta testers of the Apple iPhone.) Some clips:
Blog Categories:
culture/politics,
memory/learning
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I just wonder ... couldn't it just be a natural adaptation to the new technology era we're living? When access to technology becomes pervasive and nicely integrated with the human brain as it's expected to happen soon ... we won't need so much memory and we'll need to increase other new capabilities such as multitasking among others. Relying on a memory that is far better than ours and is even collective if need be doesn't seem such a bad thing to me.
ReplyDeleteI think of the 'use it or lose it' idea, in response to your comment. Cave dwelling Salamanders have lost their eyes because they didn't need to use them. Do we loose the large number of brain cells and neural circuits we used to devote to memory as we offload that memory function to machines that we have become symbiotic with? Is that a bad thing? Maybe not, as long as we can count on those machines.
ReplyDelete