I was ruminating this morning over a number of books I have read, and decided to send the following prompt to ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Deep Seek, and Claude: "Please collect, integrate, and unify the main messages of the following authors, and write an essay about the model of how humans work that they present.  Here are their books:  1. Daniel Wegner "The Illusion of Conscious Will.  2. Guy Claxton "Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind." 3. Daniel Kahneman " "Thinking, Fast and Slow.     4.  Lian McGildchrist "The Master and his Emissary.""
The most lyrical and original response was that of DeepSeek, just below, which I follow with ChatGPT' 5s version.  
The Divided Self: An Integrated Model of the Unconscious Mind and the Illusion of Control
For
 centuries, the prevailing model of the human mind was that of a 
conscious, rational captain at the helm of a ship, directing thought, 
making choices, and steering behavior through the force of will. 
However, a convergence of insights from psychology and neuroscience, 
powerfully articulated by Daniel Wegner, Guy Claxton, Daniel Kahneman, 
and Iain McGilchrist, has fundamentally dismantled this model. Together,
 they present a more complex, layered, and humbling picture: human 
beings are largely governed by a vast, powerful, and intelligent 
unconscious system, while our conscious mind is a late-arriving narrator
 and a limited executive, often mistaking its own story for reality. 
This integrated model reveals a psyche not of a single captain, but of a
 deep, intuitive ocean with a small, chatty lighthouse on its shore.
The
 foundational layer of this model is the primacy of the unconscious. 
Kahneman’s “System 1” and Claxton’s “undermind” are labels for this same
 powerful entity. It is fast, automatic, intuitive, and operates 
effortlessly and continuously. It is the system that recognizes faces, 
understands language, and generates gut feelings. Claxton elevates this 
system beyond mere automaticity, arguing that the “tortoise mind” is a 
form of intelligence superior to deliberate reasoning for complex, fuzzy
 problems. It is a mode of knowing that works through patient 
perception, incubation, and insight, rather than brute-force logic. This
 undermind is not a simple computer; it is a sophisticated, associative 
learning engine that shapes our reality long before consciousness 
intervenes.
Into this 
rich, unconscious landscape enters the conscious self, which these 
authors argue is not the prime mover it believes itself to be. Daniel 
Wegner delivers the most direct challenge with his “illusion of 
conscious will.” He amasses evidence to show that the feeling of willing
 an action is itself a conscious experience generated by the unconscious brain after
 it has already initiated the action. The brain produces both the action
 and the subsequent feeling of having willed it, creating a compelling 
but often false narrative of agency. Our conscious mind is not the 
author of our actions but a skilled interpreter, constantly constructing
 a post-hoc story to explain why we did what our unconscious processes 
had already decided to do.
Kahneman’s
 “System 2” is the character that fits this conscious interpreter. It is
 slow, effortful, and serial. It is the lighthouse beam: focused and 
logical but limited in its scope and easily depleted. While it is 
crucial for complex calculation and deliberate control, it is lazy and 
defaults to the easy, intuitive answers provided by System 1. The 
interplay between these two systems reveals a mind where most of the 
work is done automatically, with consciousness being recruited only for 
the most demanding tasks or to rationalize decisions already made.
Iain
 McGilchrist’s seminal work on brain hemisphere specialization provides a
 profound neurological and philosophical framework that unites these 
psychological insights. He argues that the two hemispheres have 
fundamentally different, though complementary, ways of being in the 
world. The right hemisphere (The Master) is responsible for broad, open,
 sustained attention. It engages with the living, complex, and 
interconnected world as it is—a whole. It is the source of novelty, 
empathy, context, and the “grand picture.” It correlates perfectly with 
Claxton’s undermind and the holistic, associative nature of Kahneman’s 
System 1.
The left 
hemisphere (The Emissary), in contrast, is designed for narrow, focused 
attention. It takes the rich, complex world delivered by the right 
hemisphere and abstracts it, categorizes it, and breaks it down into 
parts to make it useful. It is the hemisphere of language, logic, and 
linearity. It is an excellent tool, but it has a dangerous tendency to 
mistake its abstracted, re-presented model of the world for reality 
itself. McGilchrist’s thesis is that modern Western culture has become 
pathologically dominated by the left hemisphere’s narrow, utilitarian 
view, silencing the Master’s wisdom.
When integrated, a powerful unified model emerges:
- The Unconscious as the Foundation:
 Our primary mode of engagement with the world is through the right 
hemisphere-led, unconscious system (Claxton’s undermind, Kahneman’s 
System 1). It is the source of genuine insight, holistic understanding, 
and most of our everyday intelligence. 
- Consciousness as the Interpreter:
 The left hemisphere (a key component of Kahneman’s System 2) is not the
 king but the press secretary. It takes the rich, ambiguous input from 
the right hemisphere and creates a simplified, linear narrative to 
explain it. This is the mechanical process behind Wegner’s “illusion of 
conscious will.” 
- The Pathological Imbalance:
 Problems arise when the Emissary (the left hemisphere) usurps the 
Master’s (the right hemisphere) role. We become trapped in a cycle of 
overthinking (Claxton), relying on faulty and biased heuristics 
(Kahneman), and living in a detached, abstracted world of our own 
construction, all the while fiercely believing in our own conscious 
control (Wegner). This leads to a loss of wisdom, connection, and 
creativity. 
The
 implications of this model are vast. It suggests that the path to wiser
 decision-making and a richer life is not through doubling down on 
conscious effort and control, but through learning to get out of our own
 way. It involves trusting the incubation process of the tortoise mind 
(Claxton), recognizing the biases of our quick System 1 to engage our 
lazy System 2 more effectively (Kahneman), understanding that our sense 
of will is a feeling to be questioned rather than a fact to be trusted 
(Wegner), and ultimately, cultivating a way of being that re-engages the
 broad, empathetic, and contextual attention of the right hemisphere 
(McGilchrist).
In 
conclusion, these four authors collectively paint a picture of the human
 being as a creature of profound unconscious depth. Our conscious mind 
is a useful but limited tool—a storyteller, an emissary, a lighthouse 
beam. True wisdom lies not in the tyranny of this narrow consciousness, 
but in re-establishing a proper relationship with the vast, intelligent,
 and intuitive unconscious mind from which we truly operate. We are not 
simply the one who thinks; we are also, and more fundamentally, the one 
who is thought.
*****************************
Here is the ChatGPT response
 
How Humans Work: An Integrated Model from Wegner, Claxton, Kahneman, and McGilchrist
What follows is a synthesis—four vantage points on one creature. Daniel Wegner asks whether the “I” that claims authorship is real; Guy Claxton contrasts quick, explicit thinking with slower, subterranean intelligence; Daniel Kahneman formalizes the duet between fast and slow cognition; and Iain McGilchrist reframes the stage itself by showing how two hemispheric “styles” shape what can be noticed and valued. Put together, they outline a model of humans as embodied prediction-makers whose conscious will is a late-arriving narrator, whose intelligence ranges from snap judgments to slow gestation, and whose perception is biased by complementary—but increasingly imbalanced—modes of attention.
Below I first distill the core theses, then unify them into a single working model with practical implications.
The Four Core Theses (in one paragraph each)
Wegner — The Interpreter Illusion.
In The Illusion of Conscious Will, Wegner argues that the sense of “I willed this” is often a post-hoc construction. When thought A precedes action B and no obvious external cause intrudes, we infer authorship. But experimental manipulations (from ideomotor effects to facilitated communication) show that actions can be initiated by unconscious processes while consciousness confabulates a story of control. The upshot isn’t that we are puppets; it’s that the conscious self is more press secretary than president—essential for narration, social accountability, and learning, but less central to initiation than it feels.
Claxton — The Intelligence of Not-Knowing.
In Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind, Claxton champions a tortoise mode: slow, diffuse, context-soaked cognition that resists premature closure. Creativity, moral sense, taste, and know-how often emerge when attention softens, the body settles, and the mind incubates. Overreliance on the hare—fast, explicit, problem-solving—yields brittle understanding. His point isn’t anti-intellectual; it’s anti-impatient. The mind’s best work is sometimes done beneath articulation, then surfaces as insight.
Kahneman — Two Systems, Two Error Profiles.
Thinking, Fast and Slow formalizes a dual-process architecture: System 1 (fast, automatic, associative, effortless) and System 2 (slow, deliberative, rule-based, effortful). System 1 is generally adaptive but prone to heuristic biases (availability, representativeness, anchoring, loss aversion). System 2 can correct these—but is lazy, capacity-limited, and itself biased by what System 1 serves up. Humans, therefore, are predictably irrational in patterned ways.
McGilchrist — Two Ways of Attending, Two Worlds Revealed.
In The Master and His Emissary, McGilchrist reframes left/right hemisphere differences as styles of attention. The right hemisphere takes a broad, living, context-rich, relational view (the “Master”); the left hemisphere narrows and manipulates, favoring abstraction, categorization, and certainty (the “Emissary”). Both are indispensable, but culture often over-privileges the left-style: the map over the territory, procedure over presence. This isn’t pop lateralization; it’s a claim about what kinds of reality our habits of attention bring forth.
A Unified Model: The Predictive, Layered Human
Put together, these theses suggest a layered architecture guided by predictive processing—the brain continuously infers the causes of sensations and acts to minimize prediction error.
- 
Generation Layer (Unconscious, Predictive, Embodied). 
 - 
Most behavior originates here: learned priors, habits, somatic cues, and context-sensitive patterning. 
- 
This layer operates largely in Kahneman’s System 1 tempo, but it includes Claxton’s tortoise capacities: slow consolidation and incubation reshape the priors without conscious micromanagement. 
- 
From McGilchrist’s lens, the right hemisphere’s open, relational attention supplies the global model; the left extracts tools and symbols from it. 
 
- 
Supervisory Layer (Deliberative, Limited, Corrective). 
 - 
Kahneman’s System 2 lives here: working memory, explicit reasoning, counterfactuals, and rule application. 
- 
It cannot run the whole show (too slow, too costly), but it is crucial for model revision: checking impulses, simulating futures, and overriding stereotypes. 
 
- 
Narrative Layer (Authorship, Justification, Social Interface). 
 - 
Wegner’s insight lands here: consciousness serves as the interpreter and spokesperson—making sense of what happened, claiming authorship, communicating reasons, and learning from outcomes. 
- 
The narrative is not epiphenomenal in function (it shapes learning, norms, and coordination), but it often follows rather than leads initiation. 
 
- 
Attentional Style (Context-Setter Across Layers). 
 
How these parts cooperate
- 
Initiation: Fast predictive routines propose actions (System 1). 
- 
Incubation & Insight: When problems resist forcing, the tortoise mode lets diffuse networks recombine material; insights surface as “Aha!” with the feeling of obviousness. 
- 
Evaluation & Correction: System 2 samples alternatives, detects bias (anchoring, framing), and can veto. 
- 
Narration & Learning: The interpreter weaves a story, enabling credit assignment and social exchange; stories feed back to update priors. 
- 
Attentional Governance: Right/left styles regulate what gets priority, preventing the map from replacing the terrain. 
Tensions, Trade-offs, and Common Errors
- 
The Overconfident Narrator. 
 
- 
The “Hare” Monopoly. 
 
- 
System-1 Overreach vs. System-2 Fatigue. 
 - 
Heuristics save time but mislead in unfamiliar domains (Kahneman). Yet trying to “System-2” everything leads to ego depletion and paralysis. Use selective effort: save System-2 for high-stakes, novel, or adversarial contexts. 
 
- 
Left-Style Capture. 
 - 
When abstraction and control dominate, we edit out living context (McGilchrist). Rebalance with right-style practices: perspective-taking, embodied awareness, contact with particulars (people, places, art). 
 
Practical Operating System: How to Think and Act with This Model
Design workflows that respect incubation.
- 
Time-box exploration → incubation → articulation. For complex writing or decisions, schedule non-doing phases (walks, music, light chores). Claxton’s tortoise needs room. 
Bias-aware checkpoints.
Narrative humility with accountability.
Attentional cycling rituals.
Embodiment as intelligence, not afterthought.
- 
Treat bodily state (sleep, affect, breath, posture) as inputs to the predictive system, not noise. Fatigue, pain, or anxiety bias priors and narrow attention. 
Team cognition by design.
- 
Compose groups with complementary strengths: fast pattern spotters, patient incubators, rigorous skeptics, and context-keepers. Make the roles explicit so the “Master” isn’t marginalized by the “Emissary.” 
Reconciling “Illusion of Will” with Responsibility
A common worry: if conscious will often interprets rather than initiates, is agency a mirage? The synthesis suggests a different stance:
- 
Initiation is frequently unconscious; 
- 
Responsibility attaches to the whole predictive system over time—what habits we cultivate, what environments we choose, which checks we adopt, how we repair errors. 
- 
The narrator’s job is not to pretend omnipotence, but to own the learning loop. 
A One-Page Summary
- 
What we are: Predictive, embodied systems that act first by learned patterns, then explain and refine. 
- 
How we think: In two tempos—fast, heuristic; slow, reflective—with a third slow-diffuse mode for incubation and creativity. 
- 
How we see: Through two attentional styles—right (broad, living context) and left (focused, abstracting)—that must cycle. 
- 
Where we fail: Confabulating control; rushing to closure; overusing System 1 in novel domains; letting left-style attention crowd out reality. 
- 
How to improve: Ritualize incubation; deploy bias checkpoints selectively; narrate with humility; cycle attention deliberately; respect the body; architect diverse teams. 
Seen together, Wegner, Claxton, Kahneman, and McGilchrist don’t cancel out—they complete one another. They offer a humane, workable picture: we are not the sovereign pilots we imagine, but neither are we passengers. We are gardeners of a predictive ecology—tending habits, curating contexts, and telling better stories so that, over time, our fast intuitions, slow reflections, and styles of attention come into wiser alignment with the world.
.