How does the brain respond to statements that clash with a person's value system? We recorded event-related brain potentials while respondents from contrasting political-ethical backgrounds completed an attitude survey on drugs, medical ethics, social conduct, and other issues. Our results show that value-based disagreement is unlocked by language extremely rapidly, within 200 to 250 ms after the first word that indicates a clash with the reader's value system (e.g., "I think euthanasia is an acceptable/unacceptable…"). Furthermore, strong disagreement rapidly influences the ongoing analysis of meaning, which indicates that even very early processes in language comprehension are sensitive to a person's value system. Our results testify to rapid reciprocal links between neural systems for language and for valuation.
This blog reports new ideas and work on mind, brain, behavior, psychology, and politics - as well as random curious stuff. (Try the Dynamic Views at top of right column.)
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Our brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements.
Van Berkum et. al. make observations that go alongside the observations on moral conviction and religiosity mentioned in last friday's post.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
YOUR BRAIN KICKS IN AND SAYS
ReplyDelete"OH NO THE HELL HE DID NOT! GET HIM! HES WRONG! GET HER! NOW!"
THEN U PULL OUT YOUR CLAWS AND ATTACK! IVE GOTTA POST THIS TO MY BLOG..I SURE HOPE YOU DONT MIND DERIC!
*DELLA!