When a part of the body moves, the sensation evoked by a probe stimulus to that body part is attenuated. Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain this robust and general effect. First, feedforward motor signals may modulate activity evoked by incoming sensory signals. Second, reafferent sensation from body movements may mask the stimulus. Here we delivered probe stimuli to the right index finger just before a cue which instructed subjects to make left or right index finger movements. When left and right cues were equiprobable, we found attenuation for stimuli to the right index finger just before this finger was cued (and subsequently moved). However, there was no attenuation in the right finger just before the left finger was cued. This result suggests that the movement made in response to the cue caused ‘postdictive’ attenuation of a sensation occurring prior to the cue. In a second experiment, the right cue was more frequent than the left. We now found attenuation in the right index finger even when the left finger was cued and moved. This attenuation linked to a movement that was likely but did not in fact occur, suggests a new expectation-based mechanism, distinct from both feedforward motor signals and postdiction. Our results suggest a new mechanism in motor-sensory interactions in which the motor system tunes the sensory inputs based on expectations about future possible actions that may not, in fact, be implemented.
This blog reports new ideas and work on mind, brain, behavior, psychology, and politics - as well as random curious stuff
Friday, August 15, 2008
Anticipation of movement suppresses sensory awareness.
Here is an interesting tidbit...Voss et al. show that the mere expectation of moving a part of our body suppresses that body part's openness to sensory input. Here is the abstract:
Posted by Deric Bownds at 5:30 AM
Blog Categories: acting/choosing, attention/perception
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
This finding brings to mind similar phenomena with regard to perception in the external world. One that I continually am reminded of is the perceptual opponent-process paradigmatic case of the stationary escalator stair case appearing to move backward given our implicit expectation that it be moving the other direction. I've always found this one really neat because even though I've read that this has been a demonstrated psyhological effect, I still often step onto stationary escalators with a bit of hesitation - indicating that my unconscious perceptual system does, if just for a split second, suggests that this staircase is mobile and is moving toward me rather than away.ReplyDelete