Tuesday, September 08, 2009
How did economists get it so wrong?
Krugman's article in the New York Times Sunday Magazine is really worth reading.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Deric"s Website
EMAIL DERICMINDBLOG WEB LECTURES:
How much can we change our aging? - Lecture to senior group, Jan. 2018
Making our Brains Younger - 15 min lecture to senior group, Feb., 2014
INTRODUCTORY WEB LECTURES:
MindStuff: A guide for the the curious user
Mindstuff - Bonbons for the curious user
MINDBLOG PODCASTS:
Archives
Selected Blog Categories
- acting/choosing (478)
- aging (315)
- aging. (1)
- animal behavior (238)
- attention/perception (565)
- autism (21)
- brain plasticity (376)
- consciousness (291)
- cul (1)
- culture (42)
- culture politics (3)
- culture/politics (981)
- deric (246)
- disease (2)
- embodied cognition (60)
- emotion (375)
- emotions (75)
- evolution/debate (122)
- evolutionary psychology (121)
- exercise (28)
- faces (126)
- fear (6)
- fear/anxiety/stress (412)
- future (63)
- futures (125)
- genes (141)
- happiness (260)
- human development (241)
- human evolution (264)
- language (157)
- meditation (99)
- memory (10)
- memory/learning (292)
- mindfulness (30)
- mirror neurons (64)
- morality (98)
- motivation/reward (153)
- music (250)
- psychology (181)
- religion (115)
- self (194)
- self help (124)
- sex (150)
- sleep (68)
- social cognition (590)
- technology (363)
- unconscious (78)
- vision (41)
FeedBurner Feed 
is typo intentional?
ReplyDeleteThanks, I fixed it.
ReplyDeleteAlso, some further comments in Krugman's blog:
ReplyDeletehttp://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/05/a-few-notes-on-my-magazine-article/
Krugman's characterization of the split between the beautiful theory and real world messy complexity seems right on the money to me. Everyone seems want to reduce problems in complex biological/social systems to punchy emotionally-resonant slogans. It's not the way biological, and therefore social systems work - the deeper you go, the more complexity you find. This seems to me to be a massive problem for economics in particular: an attempt at science which is continuous collision with the arational conglomeration of just-so beliefs that is politics. Most political beliefs cannot resist trivial attempts at falsification yet they're allowed to more-or-less drive economic theory. It's not going to work, reliably.