Tuesday, September 08, 2009
How did economists get it so wrong?
Krugman's article in the New York Times Sunday Magazine is really worth reading.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Deric"s Website
EMAIL DERICMINDBLOG WEB LECTURES:
Can we really change our aging? - 15 min lecture to senior group, Nov., 2015
Making our Brains Younger - 15 min lecture to senior group, Feb., 2014
INTRODUCTORY WEB LECTURES:
MindStuff: A guide for the the curious user
Mindstuff - Bonbons for the curious user
MINDBLOG PODCASTS:
Archives
Selected Blog Categories
- acting/choosing (464)
- aging (304)
- aging. (1)
- animal behavior (234)
- attention/perception (550)
- autism (21)
- brain plasticity (364)
- consciousness (274)
- cul (1)
- culture (34)
- culture/politics (911)
- deric (242)
- disease (2)
- embodied cognition (59)
- emotion (365)
- emotions (62)
- evolution/debate (120)
- evolutionary psychology (121)
- exercise (26)
- faces (123)
- fear (6)
- fear/anxiety/stress (398)
- future (48)
- futures (111)
- genes (139)
- happiness (253)
- human development (236)
- human evolution (259)
- language (151)
- meditation (90)
- memory (9)
- memory/learning (286)
- mindfulness (20)
- mirror neurons (63)
- morality (95)
- motivation/reward (153)
- music (248)
- psychology (180)
- religion (114)
- self (177)
- self help (113)
- sex (145)
- sleep (67)
- social cognition (562)
- technology (332)
- unconscious (76)
- vision (33)
FeedBurner Feed 
is typo intentional?
ReplyDeleteThanks, I fixed it.
ReplyDeleteAlso, some further comments in Krugman's blog:
ReplyDeletehttp://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/05/a-few-notes-on-my-magazine-article/
Krugman's characterization of the split between the beautiful theory and real world messy complexity seems right on the money to me. Everyone seems want to reduce problems in complex biological/social systems to punchy emotionally-resonant slogans. It's not the way biological, and therefore social systems work - the deeper you go, the more complexity you find. This seems to me to be a massive problem for economics in particular: an attempt at science which is continuous collision with the arational conglomeration of just-so beliefs that is politics. Most political beliefs cannot resist trivial attempts at falsification yet they're allowed to more-or-less drive economic theory. It's not going to work, reliably.