Tuesday, September 08, 2009
How did economists get it so wrong?
Krugman's article in the New York Times Sunday Magazine is really worth reading.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Deric"s Website
EMAIL DERICMINDBLOG WEB LECTURES:
How much can we change our aging? - Lecture to senior group, Jan. 2018
Making our Brains Younger - 15 min lecture to senior group, Feb., 2014
INTRODUCTORY WEB LECTURES:
MindStuff: A guide for the the curious user
Mindstuff - Bonbons for the curious user
MINDBLOG PODCASTS:
Archives
Selected Blog Categories
- acting/choosing (489)
- aging (328)
- aging. (1)
- animal behavior (244)
- attention/perception (577)
- autism (22)
- brain plasticity (391)
- consciousness (298)
- cul (1)
- culture (54)
- culture politics (7)
- culture/politics (1031)
- deric (247)
- disease (4)
- embodied cognition (60)
- emotion (381)
- emotions (80)
- evolution/debate (126)
- evolutionary psychology (124)
- exercise (28)
- faces (128)
- fear (7)
- fear/anxiety/stress (434)
- future (78)
- futures (140)
- genes (146)
- happiness (266)
- human development (250)
- human evolution (273)
- language (161)
- meditation (108)
- memory (13)
- memory/learning (307)
- mindfulness (31)
- mirror neurons (64)
- morality (103)
- motivation/reward (153)
- music (257)
- psychology (181)
- religion (117)
- self (203)
- self help (128)
- sex (154)
- sleep (70)
- social cognition (619)
- technology (400)
- unconscious (78)
- vision (43)
FeedBurner Feed 
is typo intentional?
ReplyDeleteThanks, I fixed it.
ReplyDeleteAlso, some further comments in Krugman's blog:
ReplyDeletehttp://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/05/a-few-notes-on-my-magazine-article/
Krugman's characterization of the split between the beautiful theory and real world messy complexity seems right on the money to me. Everyone seems want to reduce problems in complex biological/social systems to punchy emotionally-resonant slogans. It's not the way biological, and therefore social systems work - the deeper you go, the more complexity you find. This seems to me to be a massive problem for economics in particular: an attempt at science which is continuous collision with the arational conglomeration of just-so beliefs that is politics. Most political beliefs cannot resist trivial attempts at falsification yet they're allowed to more-or-less drive economic theory. It's not going to work, reliably.