More amazing stuff from Daniel Levitan on music...first an except from the introduction to his 
latest paper in PNAS:
Musical behaviors—singing, dancing, and playing instruments—date back to Neanderthals, and have been a part of every human culture as far back as we know. People experience great enjoyment and pleasure from music,
 and music theorists have argued that this enjoyment stems in part from 
the structural features of music, such as the generation and violation of expectations... Mathematics has often been used to characterize, model, and understand music, from Schenkerian analysis to neural topography; and geometric models of tonality. One particular mathematical relation that has received attention in music is the 1/f distribution, which Mandelbrot termed “fractal.” 1/f distributions have been found to be a key feature of a number of natural and sensory phenomena. Analyzing the frequency
                  of several natural disasters, including earthquakes, landslides, floods, and terrestrial meteor impacts,  reveals an inverse log-log linear (fractal) relation between the frequency and the intensity of the events.
Here is the abstract:
Much of our enjoyment of music comes from its balance of predictability and surprise. Musical pitch fluctuations follow a
                     1/f power law that precisely achieves this
 balance. Musical rhythms, especially those of Western classical music, 
are considered
                     highly regular and predictable, and this 
predictability has been hypothesized to underlie rhythm's contribution 
to our enjoyment
                     of music. Are musical rhythms indeed entirely 
predictable and how do they vary with genre and composer? To answer this
 question,
                     we analyzed the rhythm spectra of 1,788 movements 
from 558 compositions of Western classical music. We found that an 
overwhelming
                     majority of rhythms obeyed a 1/fβ power law across 16 subgenres and 40 composers, with β ranging from ∼0.5–1. Notably, classical composers, whose compositions
                     are known to exhibit nearly identical 1/f pitch spectra, demonstrated distinctive 1/f rhythm spectra: Beethoven's rhythms were among the most predictable, and Mozart's among the least. Our finding of the ubiquity
                     of 1/f rhythm spectra in compositions 
spanning nearly four centuries demonstrates that, as with musical pitch,
 musical rhythms also
                     exhibit a balance of predictability and surprise 
that could contribute in a fundamental way to our aesthetic experience 
of
                     music. Although music compositions are intended to 
be performed, the fact that the notated rhythms follow a 1/f 
spectrum indicates that such structure is no mere artifact of 
performance or perception, but rather, exists within the written
                     composition before the music is performed. 
Furthermore, composers systematically manipulate (consciously or 
otherwise) the
                     predictability in 1/f rhythms to give their compositions unique identities. 
                  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment