This blog reports new ideas and work on mind, brain, behavior, psychology, and politics - as well as random curious stuff. (Try the Dynamic Views at top of right column.)
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
If it is difficult to pronounce, it must be risky.
Song and Schwartz make the observation that low processing fluency (as with names that are difficult to pronounce) fosters the impression that a stimulus is unfamiliar, which in turn results in perceptions of higher risk. Ostensible food additives were rated as more harmful when their names were difficult to pronounce than when their names were easy to pronounce, and amusement-park rides were rated as more likely to make one sick (an undesirable risk) and also as more exciting and adventurous (a desirable risk) when their names were difficult to pronounce than when their names were easy to pronounce.
Do you think this applies in broader areas? prescription meds that are harder to pronounce would be seen as dangerous? or stronger and therefore better? Consulting services with weird names or acronyms wouldn't be any good?
ReplyDeleteI suspect this carries over to examples like the ones you give, but it would be nice to have more data showing it.
ReplyDelete