tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22093933.post8780859310789351528..comments2024-03-18T16:12:07.747-05:00Comments on Deric's MindBlog: Faith in flux...Deric Bowndshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16617204535017208765noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22093933.post-28185445426611769242009-05-07T08:54:00.000-05:002009-05-07T08:54:00.000-05:00Deric, this is a timely post for me, (synchronicit...Deric, this is a timely post for me, (synchronicity?) as this morning, I'm writing around this idea: The Human Endeavor is comprised equally by the scientific endeavor, and the spiritual endeavor. (spiritual being that which emerges from physical processes but exist and operate as non-physical processes.) <br /><br />One thing I would note in this context is that often, those who originate themselves in one side of our endeavor at the exclusion of the other, will unconsciously include the other in their self singularised form of the total human endeavor: Those who center on the spiritual, will conceive some portion of their spirituality in terms of technology, (ie, prayer/medicine) while those who center on the scientific, will find some portion to conceive in terms of meaning. (i.e., method/god).<br /><br />Because Human Being is the only species to exist with the Human Endeavor, we will see analogies in nature that point to aspects, but never the totality of what it means to be fully human. For this, we are on our own; and I would argue that the success of the Human Endeavor will depend on a deep dialogue between both of our underlying and uniquely human endeavors, though different, are equally necessary to the ultimate wholeness of our species.Mike Gottschalkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03570606130437615456noreply@blogger.com